Questions and Answers
Vitamin D Dosage
How much vitamin D should I take?
Before I answer, I have a few questions for you:
- Where do you live (latitude)?
- How much do you weigh?
- What skin type do you have?
- How much do you go into the sun?
- What is your 25(OH)D level?
- During what season of the year was it obtained?
- How much do you get in your diet?
- How much do you get in supplements?
You see, the answer is different for everyone. The question
also assumes we know the ideal vitamin D blood level. We
don't know for sure—around 50 ng/mL is
the best current guess.
However, an easy answer is: 2,000 units a day. Life
Extension Foundation sells an inexpensive pharmaceutical
grade of vitamin
D. Two-hundred and fifty of the 1,000 unit capsules
cost about ten bucks. Your local health food store should
also carry 1,000 unit capsules. Just be sure they don't
contain any vitamin A. Beta-carotene is okay, but
pre-formed retinols (vitamin A) interfere with vitamin
D's function. I do not advise cod liver oil; if you
just have to take it, don't take more than a teaspoon
per day. Get your omega-3s from molecularly distilled
fish body oils (Trader
Joe's) or by eating wild salmon or sardines.
Get your vitamin D by taking vitamin D or by going into
the sun, or by combining both. J
Nutr. 1999 Dec;129(12):2246–50. J
Bone Miner Res. 2001 Oct;16(10):1899–905. J
Nutr. 2005 Jul;135(7):1647–52.
The government says 2,000 units of vitamin D a day is
safe for all adults to take without a doctors supervision.
Two thousand units a day will get about 80% of Americans
to a vitamin D level of 35 ng/mL or
higher with no risk of toxicity. The 20% still lower
than that would most likely be blacks. J
Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005 Oct;97(1–2):13–9.
For now, if you take more than 2,000 units a day, you
should do so either because you are under the care of a
health care practitioner who is knowledgeable in regards
to vitamin D (unfortunately, there are few of them),
or because you know what you are doing. I personally take
no vitamin D in the late spring, summer, or early fall
because I frequently go into the sun. I take 5,000 units
a day in the winter but I know what my vitamin D level
is because I get it checked several times a year. If I
had cancer, heart disease, Alzheimers disease, multiple
sclerosis, or a hundred other common diseases, I might
take more than 5,000 units a day—but I would check
my calcium and vitamin D levels even more often. I would
also follow my doctor's advice about standard medical
treatment.
Keep in mind that if you use a sunlamp or
a tanning parlor once a week during the winter, you don't
have to worry about blood tests because your body will
maintain adequate vitamin D blood levels. Just don't
get burned.
Also, remember to take calcium tablets if you don't
get adequate amounts of calcium in your diet—and
most people don't. Trader Joe's sells a good
Calcium/Magnesium/Zinc combination product for next to
nothing.
Vitamin D Blood Test
What blood test should I have?
The only blood test that can determine vitamin D adequacy
is a 25-hydroxyvitamin
D test. Whenever I say "vitamin D level" I
am talking about a 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Ask your
doctor to order a 25-hydroxyvitamin D blood test.
Unfortunately, many doctors order an "activated vitamin
D level," thinking it better to measure the most active
form of vitamin D. It is not. Activated vitamin D, also
known as 1,25
dihydroxyvitamin D or calcitriol,
should never be obtained to determine vitamin D sufficiency.
Calcitriol is often elevated in vitamin D deficiency. You
cannot tell anything about your vitamin D nutrition by
measuring a calcitriol level. If your doctor insists on
ordering a calcitriol level to determine your vitamin D
nutrition, find another doctor.
However, serious problems do exist with the technology
used by some laboratories to measure vitamin D levels.
Different labs will report different results when given
the exact same specimen of blood. Furthermore, the same
lab often reports significantly different numbers when
sent the same specimen of blood at different times. In
general, low numbers are more reliable than high numbers
because interfering substances can easily give falsely
elevated results. Prominent scientists have issued urgent
calls for standardization. Dr. Graham Carter, one of my
personal heroes, has dedicated his life to obtaining a
standardized, and accurate, vitamin D level. His outfit
in London is DEQAS, or Vitamin D External Quality Assessment
Scheme. Call your reference lab, such as Quest Diagnostics
at 800.222.0446, and insist they participate in DEQAS.
DEQAS's phone number in England is +44.(0)20.8383.3645. J
Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Jul;89(7):3152–7. J
Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Jul;89(7):3149–51.
If you take ergocalciferol,
or "vegetarian vitamin D", be warned. Ergocalciferol
is not vitamin D, but a vitamin D-like patent drug
whose patent has expired. It does not normally occur in
the human body and is probably a weak agonist at the receptor
site, meaning it may actually partially block vitamin D
actions. Ergocalciferol is the villain in most of the reported
cases of toxicity in the world's literature. All
bets are off in terms of measuring blood levels if you
take ergocalciferol. Some of the labs can pick it up and
some cannot. Do not take ergocalciferol—it is not
vitamin D.
If your doctor prescribes 50,000 units of ergocalciferol
(Drisdol) once or twice a week, obtain a bottle of 50,000
unit capsules of cholecalciferol from Bio-Tech
Pharmacal Inc. of Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA,
and take them instead. Take one or two per week until your
level is around 50 ng/mL.
Then stop taking them and begin maintenance therapy at
a much lower dose. You could also take one 5,000 unit capsule
every day (also available from Bio-Tech Pharmacal)
until your vitamin D level is around 50 ng/mL.
Then take enough by mouth during the cold months (and go
into the sun during the warm months) to keep your 25(OH)D level
around 50 ng/mL.
(Keep in mind that labs inside the USA usually report results
in ng/mL while
labs outside the USA use nM/L.
One ng/mL is
equal to 2.56 nM/L.
So 50 ng/mL is
about 125 nM/L.)
Take enough real vitamin D3 cholecalciferol to
maintain your level around 50 ng/mL,
year-round. A 25(OH)D level is the best, and only,
way you have of knowing if you are taking enough. However,
do not be satisfied with a 50 ng/mL level
unless you know how you are getting enough vitamin D to
explain the level (i.e., you go into the sun or take supplements).
If your level is 50 ng/mL and
you don't take supplements, don't go into the
sun, don't use a sun booth or a UVB lamp,
then the level is probably bogus. Repeat the level.
In general, keep your vitamin D level in the upper one
third of the lab's reference range—about 50 ng/mL with
the most commonly used test. If you take higher doses,
get your calcium checked when you get your 25(OH)D level,
just to be safe. If you want to be sure that your hospital
is sending their samples to an accurate reference lab,
ask the director of the hospital's lab to contact Professor
Bruce Hollis or Professor
Reinhold Vieth. Both are the world-class authorities
in vitamin D measurement technology.
Although 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (calcitriol)
should never be used to diagnose vitamin D deficiency,
calcitriol is important in evaluating one cause of high
blood calcium, called vitamin
D hypersensitivity. High blood calcium rarely
occurs due to vitamin D toxicity, but calcium is elevated
in people who have vitamin D hypersensitivity, although
their vitamin D level will be normal, or even low. Primary
hyperparathyroidism is a common cause of vitamin D hypersensitivity,
as is sarcoidosis and other granulomatous
diseases. It can occasional occur in cancer—about
20% of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
have vitamin D hypersensitivity. Any competent endocrinologist
can treat vitamin D hypersensitivity.
Effects of Higher Doses
If humans make 20,000 units of vitamin
D after sunbathing for 20 minutes in the summer, why
shouldn't I take 20,000 units every day?
Because of what we don't know we don't know.
Someone once said all knowledge comes in three categories:
(1) what you know you know, (2) what you know you don't
know, and (3), the largest category, what you don't
know you don't know. I know I know how to speak English;
I know I don't know how to speak French; I don't
know that I don't know how to speak a language that
I don't know exists.
We simply don't know the effects of taking 10,000
or 20,000 units a day for year after year. Although light-skinned
humans make about 50,000 of units of vitamin D after getting
a sunburn (3 times the minimal erythemal dose), we also
know they make progressively less and less vitamin D as
their skin produces more and more melanin, thereby tanning.
My 16-year-old daughter has noticed that she
tans much faster when she has been taking oral vitamin
D. That is, high blood levels may tell the skin to make
more sunblock (melanin). Undoubtedly, other natural mechanisms
exist to prevent toxicity, we just don't know. We
do know that when healthy young men took 50,000 units of
vitamin D every day for six weeks, average serum blood
levels increased by 257 ngs/ml. One young man achieved
an increase of 400 ngs/ml after only six weeks. Although
the authors found no evidence of toxicity after this six-week
experiment (serum calcium remained normal), 50,000 units
a day will eventually turn your internal organs into limestone. N
Engl J Med. 1982 Mar 25;306(12):722–5. Osteoporos
Int. 1998;8(3):222–30.
Vitamin D's Future
Where do you predict all this vitamin
D research is heading?
I predict the final Food and Nutrition Board's recommendation
(in about two decades) will be about 3,000 units a day.
I predict that science will eventually show vitamin D deficiency
is a major cause of many of the diseases of civilization.
I predict that science will eventually show that many of
these same diseases of civilization respond favorably to
vitamin D treatment. I predict science will eventually
prove vitamin D helps prevent and treat some infectious
diseases, especially viral respiratory infections like
influenza, croup, and the common cold. These are only my
attempts to prophesize the future. Remember, only time
can tell the difference between a prophet and a madman.
Vitamin D Council
Why don't you answer all your emails
promptly?
I do my best. As the circulation of the newsletter grows
and the popularity of the website increases, I am inundated
with questions. My answer is that I do my best. During
the day I work full-time to support my family. I
write, and attempt to distribute the newsletter, on the
weekends and evenings. If you don't get the newsletter,
your server is either blocking the mailing or stripping
it of its content so you get a blank e-mail. Be sure vitamindcouncil@charterinternet.com is
on your allowed list.
I can't provide personal medical advice. I can't
e-mail you copyrighted material. If you have prostate
cancer, lung cancer, or any type of cancer, you should
take enough vitamin D so you are no longer vitamin D deficient
(2,000–5,000 units a day, enough to get your vitamin
D level around 50 ng/mL and
keep it there). If you have MS,
the same is true. If I ever got the flu, I would take one
50,000 capsule of vitamin D as a single dose—although
you should know that not one scientific study exists to
support such a decision. Full-spectrum lighting has
virtually no UVB so
it will not generate any vitamin D in your skin.
I try to alert you to all the important studies, but I
miss a few. For example, a recent study showed children
with low vitamin D levels are eleven times more likely
to get lung infections! Another recent study showed
vitamin D deficiency is a major risk factor for stroke.
I spend a fair amount of time learning about vitamin D
and I hope I know what I am talking about. Readers can
answer most of their own questions by spending time on
this website as well as reading our newsletter
archives. Please feel free to read about our organization or myself.
We also provide an extensive viamin
D links section.
Where does the Vitamin D Council get
its funding and what do you do with all the money?
We don't have any funding. We try to save the little
money we have. Unfortunately, the Kettering Family Foundation
just turned down our $100,000 grant request. I hoped
they would fund us as they generously funded me in the
late 1980s when I attempted (unsuccessfully) to reform
testing in Americas public schools. Currently we operate
on private donations from readers and a $5,000.00
donation that my wife and I made to the Vitamin D Council
last year. The first thing we will do when we get funding
is to sponsor a yearly seminar on vitamin D geared towards
both health care practitioners and interested lay people.
We will ask vitamin D experts from around the country to
speak in plain language about practical aspects of vitamin
D nutrition. If you know anyone who knows anyone with grant
money please ask them to contact
us. I have no doubt that God will provide, should we
be doing something worthwhile.
We need funding of course, so any donations are appreciated.
We also need someone who is fluent in German and can translate
German medical papers into English. Email me if you are
fluent in medical German and are willing to help.
|